n History of Opioids
Although there is universal recognition of the potent analgesic effects of opioids, many physicians are reluctant to employ them due to the risk of addiction. Over the last few decades, the benefits of opioid use in the acute post-operative period and in cancer patients has become evident. Despite that, the controversy between lay people, regulatory authorities, and physicians remains regarding the use of opioid analgesics for chronic non-cancer pain. While the debate stays open, millions of patients with acute and chronic pain suffer the consequences. To better understand the cultural and regulatory barriers that surround the medical use of opioids, it is instructive to analyze the historical context about their use and abuse.
n Opioids: Types and Uses
There are many types of opioids and they are classified in many ways. For example: 1) Natural vs. semi-synthetic vs. synthetic. 2) Strong vs. weak. 3) Duration of action- a. short vs. medium; b. immediate release vs. controlled release. 4) Analgesic vs. nonanalgesic. 5) By federal schedule (CI-CV). 6) By receptor affinity. 7) Legal vs. illegal. 8) Agonist vs. partial agonist vs. antagonist. There are many uses for opioids. The major focus here is, of course, on analgesia. But there are other, often fascinating, uses which will be covered: anesthesia, antitussive, antidiarrheal, antispasmodic, drug abuse, opioid maintenance treatment, opioid detoxification, vasodilatation/smooth muscle relaxation, and even antiterror.
n Risk Management and Related Medico-Legal Issues
n with the Practice of Chronic Opioid Therapy
Risk management and related micro-legal issues are reviewed with respect to clinicians who undertake chronic opioid therapy in their practice. Risk factors are discussed with reference to typical malpractice claims, medical board complaints, and reports in medico-legal literature. Specific issues include guideline and Model Pain Policies implementation, scope of practice, record keeping/documentation, patient abandonment, communication with co-treating clinicians, and particular risks within solo versus group practice. The relative risk of undertaking chronic opioid therapy is contrasted to risks inherent in other pharmacotherapy or interventional treatments.
n Rotation of Opioids
Escalating opioid requirements can be a consequence of either progression of disease or tolerance. There is increasing awareness among pain specialists that there may be a ceiling effect on the opioid dosing above which hyperalgesia, sedation, cognitive dysfunction, myoclonus or other side-effects may limit further upward titration. Opioid rotation takes advantage of incomplete opioid cross-tolerance which implies that an equianalgesic dose of a different opioid—one to which the patient has not been exposed before—will be much lower than expected. This may result in a 40% reduction in dosage while maintaining the same or better analgesia. Providers can use opioid rotation to reduce side-effects or improve efficacy in opioid tolerant individuals.
n Judicious Screening: Psychosocial Issues with
n Chronic Opioid Therapy
Assessment of chronic pain is discussed with a focus on
psychosocial evaluation and screening. Screening issues are addressed with respect to chronic opioid therapy with commentary on behavioral strategies intended to maximize adherence to the medical treatment regimen. The integration of nonpharmacologic strategies into the treatment regimen is discussed with a brief review of cognitive and relaxation interventions. Evidence-based interdisciplinary treatment is emphasized with additional discussion on barriers to effective treatment.
n Interventional Techniques Used in Pain Management
There are various interventional techniques that can be used in pain management. One important consideration is the use of image guidance in the performance of said interventional techniques and differential diagnosis between certain types
of pain. Back, neck, and head pain all have common causes. Possible interventional techniques to treat these three conditions include sacroiliac injection, facet/medial branch injection, sympathetic blocks, discography, radiofrequency, IDET, percutaneous disc decompression, vertebroplasty, Botox
® injection, and implantables (nerve stimulators and intrathecal pumps). The indications, contraindications, and possible side effects of these techniques will be discussed.
n Identification and Treatment of Opioid Dependence
Opioid dependence is a brain disease which will affect a certain percentage of patients treated with opioid analgesics for pain. It is crucial for physicians treating pain with opioids to be able to identify and treat these patients in a timely and effective manner. In 2002, the Drug Addiction Treatment Act gave all physicians (including pain management, family practice and internal medicine practitioners) the legal right to treat their patients for opioid dependence in the privacy of their own office. This introductory presentation will cover the following topics: overview of opioid dependence, in-office treatment options for opioid dependence, opioid dependence in chronic and acute pain patients, patient assessment and treatment/referral process, and available clinical tools.
n Urine Drug Testing: Which Patient, Which Drug, Why
Opioid toxicology in various disease states will be discussed, along with the issue of rotation, the use of adjunctive medications, and how to taper and increase dosing in a safe manner. The treatment of side effects will be considered. Drug screening will cover use and misuse of opioids and what testing is most helpful. Urine testing, although not totally accurate, is a quick, practical, and cost-effective way of making sure which patients are or are not taking medications and to protect physician and patient from the problem of diversion.
Day Two* – Sunday 8:00 am – 4:30 pm
*Program and faculty subject to change
©Copyright 2006 by Prime National Publishing Corporation. All rights reserved. Any redistribution or reproduction of any materials herein is strictly prohibited.